Friday, June 3, 2011

SENIOR PROGRAMS SLASHED IN FINAL STATE BUDGET

By Jerry Reilly

Services and programs important to older people are severely slashed in the budget adopted by the Legislature for the next two years. Nearly one half billion dollars in state and federal funds have been cut from the budget for services vital to seniors

Home care hours have been cut by 10% for people who get help from home care workers in order to remain in their own homes. Additional training for home care workers approved by Initiative 1029 has been postponed once again.

Enrollment in the Basic Health Plan (BHP) program will continue to decline. Approximately one third of BHP enrollees are between 50 and 65 years old.
The state will no longer pay the prescription co-pay for low income seniors enrolled in the Medicare Part D Pharmacy program. There is some hope that the federal government will end the co-pay requirement for these people in January, 2012.

Changes in the Adult Day Health program may force as many as 700 people living with developmental disabilities out of the program. Some Adult Day Health Centers will likely close.

The Senior Citizens Services Act will have reductions to the Meals on Wheels and other services provided through the Area Agencies on Aging.

Dental coverage for Adults on Medicaid will be severely restricted to only emergency services. Services will still be available for people who receive long term care services.

Eyeglasses and hearing aids will no longer be available to adults on Medicaid.
One positive step taken by the Legislature was to enact a Safety Net Assessment Fee on nursing homes that will provide funds to generate additional federal Medicaid dollars. This program avoided about $80 million in cuts that would otherwise have been imposed on the funding for the care of about 11,000 Medicaid residents in nursing homes.

The sweep and severity of the cuts to senior programs is difficult to comprehend. Without doubt this is the worse budget we have ever seen. Senior programs are not alone. There were harmful cuts throughout the safety net programs that affect children, people with disabilities, mentally ill people and all low income people. Education programs, especially higher education, have also been deeply cut.

How did things get this bad? The twin drivers of this sad situation were the steep decline in state revenues driven by the great recession and the straightjacket the voters imposed on the legislature when they overwhelmingly passed Tim Eyman’s Initiative 1053 last November. This initiative re-imposed a two-thirds requirement for the legislature to pass any revenue measure or to close any tax loophole.
Once it became the accepted conventional wisdom in Olympia that the voters wanted an “all-cuts” budget, the legislature set about the task of delivering what they believed the public wanted. Some tried to make the cuts in the most responsible way available to them. Some seemed to enjoy the prospect of shrinking the footprint of state services and keeping taxes as low as possible. But almost no one argued for any real alternative to an “all-cuts” approach. Toward the end of the session, there was some attention paid to a set of notoriously outrageous tax loopholes, but in the end nothing was done to change our regressive, preference ridden, and inadequate tax structure.

Most discouraging of all was that nothing was done to lay the groundwork for a legal challenge to Eyman’s Initiative 1053 on grounds that it violates the state Constitution. So instead of a sharing of the burden of replacing the revenue lost through the recession, the old, the sick, the poor and the children were asked to shoulder a grossly disproportionate share of the load.

We now await the next revenue forecast that is due around mid-June. Hopefully, revenue will be stable and we can begin to plan getting through the next two years without further reductions.

We need also to develop a plan to convince the public that we can no longer operate a prosperous, decent, and progressive state based upon a tax structure that cannot keep pace with the needs of our people.

Jerry Reilly is Chair of the ElderCare Alliance and former Assistant Secretary of the Department of Social and Health Services. He can be reached at jerryreilly@msn.com.

1 comment:

  1. Jerry Reilly outlines the pretty dismal performance of the State Legislature in his article "Senior Programs Slashed in State Budget" (June 2011) very well indeed!

    He goes on to ask, "How did things get this bad?" He blames Eyman's 2/3's budget initiative and the lousy economy but I think he missed a far bigger historical problem.

    How did members of the legislature who for years have been supported in every way by the State Democratic Party and the State and Local Labor Councils turn on and double cross those very organizations. Both organizations are really the only two groups whose only purpose is to protect and work for all citizens and voters.

    I suggest given the lessons of this last session union members and rank and file Democrats insist the State Party and the State Labor Council look at the way they have functioned for the past 40 plus years and demand they actually develop a plan and develop some strategy - "remember a failure to plan is a plan for failure!"

    Organized Labor and the Democrats are always on the defensive in Olympia. One gets the impression none of the legislators have even been talked to before the sessions. Its all a big surprise!

    I realize the wine and cheese parties are fun but real political activism and success is measured by members, numbers and and successful ideas creating progressive legislation. And right now it ain't happening!!!

    Bill Johnston
    Retired UFCW Staff
    705 N. J St.
    Tacoma, WA 98403

    Member ARA - Tacoma Chapter

    ReplyDelete